An argument that entertainment allowance is a grant for a specific purpose, and exerting, James observes the rule. Although there is no necessity and wisdom in it, it would be invidious for the Treasurer to demand a certificate stating that the service for which the statute is made has been duly performed, especially when, as in the present case, it has been deliberately decided that money has been spent fully on the matters for which it is granted, and it should be understood that the bill has not been made fraudulent.
It is clear that the duty has been performed, and the entertainment has been carried out fully. I am of the opinion that there can be no doubt that neither the B.A.G. nor the S.V.G. should receive the money, but that it should be allowed to lapse to the Treasury. I have...
Page 405
An
that entertainment
allowance is a grant
for a specific purpose, and
excertating,
James observe the
Although there is no
necessity
and wideed
it would be invidcours
ht
for the Treasurer tor
Lemand
a certipcate
Shaved take the invidious Coness of demanding
service for thick the staut is minde
that the seating
kao been daty performed,
get when.
as in the
present case, it has
been destinatly
Monay has been spouts in fullon Har
Maits for which
it is grine,
stood that the bag has not made factund
حليه
the dust, fox
back the
the entertained at all
405
Parly. of opinion the
in my opinion
there can be
A
doubt that sen
neither the
B. A. G. nor the Sov 6.A.G.n
should receive the
money
but that it
should be allowed to
lapse to the Treasury I have
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.